| Employee Downsizing |  | 
ICMR HOME | Case Studies Collection
 Case Details:
 
 Case Code : HROB016
 Case Length : 09 Pages
 Period : 1990 - 2001
 Pub Date : 2001
 Teaching Note : Available
 Organization : Varied
 Industry : Varied
 Countries : USA, India, etc...
 
 To download Employee Downsizing case study 
(Case Code: HROB016) click on the button  below, and select the case from the list of available cases:
 
 
  
 Price:
 For delivery in electronic format: Rs. 300;
 For delivery through courier (within India): Rs. 300 + Rs. 25 for Shipping & Handling Charges
 
 
 
 » Human Resource and Organization Behavior Case Studies» HRM Short Case Studies
 » View Detailed Pricing Info
 » How To Order This Case
 » Business Case Studies
 » Area Specific Case Studies
 » Industry Wise Case Studies
 » Company Wise Case Studies
 
 
   
 
 
Please note:
 This case study was compiled from published sources, and is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion. It is not intended to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. Nor is it a primary information source.
 
 
 
 Chat with us
 
 
  
 Please leave your feedback
 
 
   | 
		
| 
	       
 << Previous "Next to the death of a relative or friend, there's 
nothing more traumatic than losing a job. Corporate cutbacks threaten the 
security and self-esteem of survivors and victims alike. They cause turmoil and 
shatter morale inside organizations and they confirm the view that profits 
always come before people." - Laura Rubach, Industry Analyst, in 1994. "The market is going to determine where we stop with the 
layoffs." - Tom Ryan, a Boeing spokesman, in August 2002. Downsizing Blues all over the World
	
		| 
The job markets across the world looked very gloomy in the early 21st century, 
with many companies having downsized a considerable part of their employee base 
and many more revealing plans to do so in the near future. 
 Companies on the Forbes 500 and Forbes International 800 lists had laid off over 
460,000 employees' altogether, during early 2001 itself.
 
 This trend created havoc in the lives of millions of employees across the world, 
Many people lost their jobs at a very short or no advance notice, and many 
others lived in a state of uncertainty regarding their jobs.
 |   
 |  
	Companies claimed that worldwide economic slowdown during the late-1990s had 
	had forced them to downsize, cut costs, optimize resources and survive the 
	slump. Though the concept of downsizing had existed for a long time, its use 
	had increased only recently, since the late-1990s. (Refer Table I for 
	information on downsizing by major companies). 
	
		|  | Analysts commented that downsizing did more damage 
			than good to the companies as it resulted in low morale of retained 
			employees, loss of employee loyalty and loss of expertise as key 
			personnel/experts left to find more secure jobs. Moreover, the 
			uncertain job environment created by downsizing negatively effected 
			the quality of the work produced. Analysts also felt that most 
			companies adopted downsizing just as a 'me-too' strategy even when 
			it was not required. However, despite these concerns, the number of 
			companies that chose to downsize their employee base increased in 
			the early 21st century. Downsizing strategy was adopted by almost 
			all major industries such as banking, automobiles, chemical, 
			information technology, fabrics, FMCG, air transportation and 
			petroleum. |  In mid-2002, some of the major companies that announced 
downsizing plans involving a large number of employees included Jaguar (UK), 
Boeing (US), Charles Schwab (US), Alactel (France), Dresdner (Germany), Lucent 
Technologies (US), Ciena Corp. (US) and Goldman Sachs Group (US). Even in 
companies' developing countries such as India, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and 
South Korea were going in for downsizing. 
 
Employee Downsizing
- Next Page>> 
 
 |  |